Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums
and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series : World's leading Event Organizer

Back

Lynn Romejko Jacobs

Lynn Romejko Jacobs

Southern Methodist University dallas USA

Title: Body mass index and body fat in college age males and females: Perception versus reality

Biography

Biography: Lynn Romejko Jacobs

Abstract

Objective

This study’s purpose is advancing knowledge about perceptions of healthy body fat and BMI among undergraduate students, examining the relationship between believed and actual body characteristics.

Participants

In September 2009, 413 freshmen completed a survey asking students to self-assess body fat percentage, BMI, and weight among other questions. 

Methods

Students were surveyed prior to and after taking body measurements. Regression was used to understand how different categories predicted level of accuracy in students’ assessments.

Results

Findings suggest students less accurately estimated BMI than body fat percentage.  Interactions suggest females and males differ in estimation accuracy, and this varied by fat categories.  Additionally, 90% of students believed body fat percentage easier to understand than BMI.

Conclusions

Since body fat percentage was significantly better understood, this measurement should be used to educate individuals on healthy weight and body composition status on a wider scale.

Table 1

Summary of Actual Weight, Body Fat Percentage, and BMI

Variable

n

M

SD

Min

Max

Total

 

 

 

 

 

     Weight (lbs.)

413

150.35

33.38

93

342

     Fat %

411

18.55

7.91

2.4

39

     BMI

409

22.96

4.05

15

47.6

Female

 

 

 

 

 

     Weight (lbs.)

216

133.86

23.81

93

286

     Fat %

214

22.39

5.00

12.6

39

     BMI

213

22.21

3.66

15.9

47.6

Male

 

 

 

 

 

     Weight (lbs.)

197

168.43

33.06

98

342

     Fat %

197

13.30

7.10

2.4

38

     BMI

196

23.78

4.31

15

46.5

Note. Measurements presented are actual numbers, not estimated predictions.

Table 2

Regression Analysis Predicting Absolute Value Difference in Weight Estimation and Weight Actual

Predictor

Coefficient

Std. Error

95% Conf. Interval

Minority

-0.635

 

0.499

[-1.616, 0.346]

Male

-0.491

 

0.501

[-1.475, 0.494]

Fat Indicator

 

 

 

 

     Under fat

-1.000

 

0.878

[-2.727, 0.727]

     Over fat

4.855

*

0.997

[2.896, 6.815]

Male by Fat Indicator

 

 

 

 

     Male and Under fat

4.177

*

2.059

[0.129, 8.225]

     Male and Over fat

-2.220

 

1.354

[-4.883, 0.442]

R-squared = 0.089

n = 410

           

Note. *p < .05

 

Table 3

Regression Analysis Predicting Absolute Value Difference in BMI Estimation and BMI Actual

Predictor

Coefficient

Std. Error

95% Conf. Interval

Minority

0.586

 

0.549

[-0.595, 1.766]

Male

2.483

*

0.601

[1.403, 3.562]

Fat Indicator

 

 

 

     Under fat

0.564

 

0.968

[-1.339, 2.468]

     Over fat

0.406

 

0.815

[-1.197, 2.008]

R-squared = 0.051

n = 407

Note. *p < .05